PostgreSQL vs MySQL: Which Open-Source Database Is Right for You?
Compare PostgreSQL and MySQL, two leading open-source relational databases. Both are completely free, but differ in features, performance, and complexity. See which fits your project.
Updated 2026-09 · 2026
PostgreSQL
Advanced open-source relational database with full SQL compliance
Strengths
- +Full ACID compliance and advanced SQL features (CTEs, window functions, JSON)
- +Extensible architecture with custom functions, data types, and extensions
- +Superior handling of complex queries and concurrent writes
Weaknesses
- -Steeper learning curve for beginners
- -More resource-intensive than MySQL for simple queries
- -Smaller ecosystem of third-party tools compared to MySQL
Best for
Complex applications requiring advanced SQL features, data warehousing, geospatial data (PostGIS), and projects prioritizing data integrity over raw speed
MySQL
Fast, reliable open-source database powering millions of websites
Strengths
- +Excellent read performance and speed for simple queries
- +Easy to learn and set up, beginner-friendly
- +Massive ecosystem with extensive third-party tool support
Weaknesses
- -Less strict about data integrity by default (depends on storage engine)
- -Limited support for advanced SQL features compared to PostgreSQL
- -Owned by Oracle, raising concerns about long-term open-source commitment
Best for
Web applications, content management systems (WordPress, Drupal), read-heavy workloads, and projects prioritizing simplicity and speed over advanced features
Feature Comparison
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| License & Cost | PostgreSQL License (MIT-style), completely free | GPL v2, completely free (Community Edition) |
| ACID Compliance | Full ACID compliance across all operations | ACID compliant with InnoDB engine (default since 5.5) |
| JSON Support | Native JSON and JSONB with indexing and querying | JSON support added in 5.7, less feature-rich |
| Full-Text Search | Built-in full-text search with multiple languages | Built-in full-text search, simpler implementation |
| Replication | Streaming replication, logical replication (more complex) | Master-slave replication (simpler setup) |
| Concurrency | MVCC (Multi-Version Concurrency Control), excellent for writes | Row-level locking, better for read-heavy workloads |
| Extensibility | Highly extensible (custom functions, types, extensions like PostGIS) | Limited extensibility, plugin architecture |
| Window Functions | Full support since version 8.4 | Added in version 8.0 (2018) |
| Common Table Expressions (CTEs) | Full support including recursive CTEs | Added in version 8.0, less optimized |
| Storage Size | Generally larger database size due to MVCC | More compact storage for similar data |
| Community & Ecosystem | Strong community, growing ecosystem | Massive ecosystem, more third-party tools |
| Performance | Better for complex queries and write-heavy workloads | Faster for simple queries and read-heavy workloads |
The Verdict
Both databases are completely free and production-ready. Choose PostgreSQL if you need advanced SQL features, complex queries, or strong data integrity guarantees. Choose MySQL if you're building a simple web application, prioritize ease of use, or need maximum read performance with a simpler setup. For most modern applications requiring flexibility and growth, PostgreSQL is the better long-term choice.
How to switch from PostgreSQL to MySQL
- 1Export your PostgreSQL database using pg_dump (e.g., pg_dump --format=plain --no-owner --no-privileges dbname > dump.sql), or export individual tables to CSV with the COPY command for a more controlled, table-by-table migration.
- 2Convert the schema and data types using pgloader, which maps PostgreSQL-specific types (like SERIAL, ARRAY, and JSONB) to their closest MySQL equivalents (AUTO_INCREMENT, JSON, TEXT) automatically, or do it manually for small schemas.
- 3Import the converted SQL into MySQL using the mysql command-line client (mysql -u user -p dbname < converted_dump.sql) or LOAD DATA INFILE for CSV-based imports, then verify row counts and spot-check data against the original.
- 4Rewrite any PostgreSQL-specific SQL — recursive CTEs, JSONB operators, array columns, PL/pgSQL functions, and PostGIS queries — since these either don't exist in MySQL or use different syntax.
- 5Update connection strings, ORM configuration (dialect: 'mysql' in Prisma/Sequelize/TypeORM), and driver dependencies in your application code, then run your full test suite against the new database.
- 6Run both databases in parallel for a short period, replicating writes or comparing outputs, before cutting over DNS/connection endpoints and decommissioning the old PostgreSQL instance.
PostgreSQL vs MySQL: common questions
How do I migrate data from PostgreSQL to MySQL?+
Use pg_dump to export your PostgreSQL data (plain SQL or custom format), then convert the schema and data types using a tool like pgloader, which can connect directly to both databases and handle the conversion in one pass. For smaller databases, exporting tables to CSV with COPY and importing them with MySQL's LOAD DATA INFILE also works, but you'll need to manually recreate indexes, constraints, and sequences as MySQL AUTO_INCREMENT columns.
What features do I lose moving from PostgreSQL to MySQL?+
You'll lose native JSONB with indexed queries (MySQL's JSON type is less optimized), full recursive CTE support, and any PostGIS geospatial functionality since MySQL has no direct equivalent. Custom functions written in PL/pgSQL, array data types, and advanced window function usage may also need to be rewritten or dropped.
Is MySQL's free tier enough for a small team?+
Yes — MySQL Community Edition is fully free with no usage caps, seat limits, or feature restrictions, so a small team can run it in production indefinitely at zero licensing cost. You'll only pay for hosting/infrastructure (or a managed service like Amazon RDS or PlanetScale) if you don't want to self-manage the server.
Will my existing tools and integrations still work with MySQL?+
Most ORMs (Prisma, Sequelize, Django ORM, ActiveRecord) and BI tools (Metabase, Tableau, Looker) support both databases, so switching the connector is usually a config change rather than a rewrite. However, any raw SQL using PostgreSQL-specific syntax (JSONB operators, arrays, RETURNING clauses in some drivers) will need to be rewritten for MySQL's dialect.
Does switching to MySQL actually save money long-term?+
Both are free open-source software, so there's no licensing cost difference — savings, if any, come from lower resource usage, since MySQL typically needs less CPU/RAM for simple read-heavy workloads. If you're on managed hosting, compare instance pricing for both engines directly (e.g., AWS RDS charges similarly for Postgres and MySQL instances of the same size), since the database engine itself isn't usually the cost driver.
Related comparisons
More Dev Tools tools people are leaving
All Dev Tools alternatives →What would you save without PostgreSQL or MySQL?
Pick your team size and see the yearly number.