JiT vs Drata: Application Security vs Compliance Automation
JiT and Drata both sit in the security stack, but they solve different problems. JiT finds and helps fix vulnerabilities in your code; Drata automates evidence collection for SOC 2 and ISO 27001. Here's how they actually compare.
Updated 2026-10 · 2026
JiT
Application security platform that finds and fixes vulnerabilities in code and dependencies
Strengths
- +Unified SAST, SCA, secrets, and IaC scanning in one platform
- +Auto-generates remediation pull requests instead of just flagging issues
- +Free tier usable by small teams and open-source projects
Weaknesses
- -Not built for compliance evidence collection or audit workflows
- -No SOC 2/ISO 27001 control mapping or auditor-facing portal
- -Smaller integration ecosystem outside of dev tooling
Best for
Engineering teams who want to catch and fix code-level vulnerabilities without adding process overhead.
Drata
Compliance automation platform for SOC 2, ISO 27001, and other security certifications
Strengths
- +Automates evidence collection across SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, and more
- +100+ integrations pulling continuous monitoring data from cloud, HR, and IT tools
- +Built-in policy templates and control mapping
Weaknesses
- -Does not scan code or dependencies for vulnerabilities
- -Pricing is not public and typically requires an annual contract
- -Implementation and control setup can take several weeks
Best for
Companies actively pursuing SOC 2 or ISO 27001 certification who need to automate audit evidence collection.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Primary purpose | Application security (SAST/SCA/secrets/IaC) | Compliance evidence automation |
| Code/dependency vulnerability scanning | Yes, native | No |
| Auto-remediation (PRs) | Yes | No |
| SOC 2 / ISO 27001 control mapping | No | Yes |
| Auditor collaboration portal | No | Yes |
| Continuous control monitoring | Limited to code/repo checks | Yes, across cloud/HR/IT tools |
| Policy templates | No | Yes |
| CI/CD integration | Yes (GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket) | Limited, via DevOps evidence connectors |
| Cloud security posture management | Partial (IaC scanning) | Yes, via integrations |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Pricing transparency | Partial (free tier public, paid custom) | Fully custom/quote-based |
The Verdict
JiT and Drata aren't really interchangeable — JiT finds bugs in your code, Drata proves to an auditor that your controls work. If you're choosing because of budget, JiT's free tier makes sense for a small dev team not yet pursuing certification. If you're switching because Drata feels too expensive or heavy for your stage, JiT won't replace it — you'll still need a separate compliance process or a cheaper compliance tool.
How to switch from JiT to Drata
- 1Export your vulnerability findings and asset inventory from JiT via the Findings dashboard (CSV export) or the JiT API (JSON) so you have a record of open issues before switching focus.
- 2Sign up for Drata and connect your core integrations (GitHub/GitLab, AWS/GCP/Azure, HRIS, MDM) so continuous monitoring can start pulling evidence immediately.
- 3Use the exported JiT findings as supporting documentation for Drata's vulnerability management control, uploading the CSV where manual evidence is requested.
- 4Recreate remediation workflows manually, since Drata doesn't auto-generate fix PRs — connect Drata's Jira/ticketing integration to route findings to engineering instead.
- 5Set up Drata's policy templates and assign control owners across your team to start the SOC 2/ISO 27001 readiness process.
- 6Decide whether to keep JiT running in parallel for ongoing code scanning (recommended) or fully decommission it — the two tools cover different risks and most teams end up running both.
JiT vs Drata: common questions
How do I export my data out of JiT before switching?+
Go to the Findings dashboard in JiT and use the Export option to download your vulnerability findings and asset inventory as a CSV. You can also pull the same data via JiT's API if you need it in JSON for scripting or re-importing elsewhere.
What do I lose if I drop JiT for Drata?+
You lose code-level vulnerability scanning, dependency (SCA) checks, secrets detection, and the auto-remediation PRs JiT generates. Drata doesn't replace any of that — it only tracks whether a vulnerability management process exists for audit purposes, not the actual scanning.
Is Drata's free tier enough for a small team?+
Drata doesn't have a free tier — pricing is custom and quote-based, typically on an annual contract. If budget is the concern, look at lower-cost compliance tools like Vanta's starter plans or Secureframe before committing to Drata.
Does Drata integrate with the same dev tools JiT does?+
Drata integrates with GitHub and GitLab for evidence purposes (e.g., confirming code review policies are followed), but it doesn't scan code for vulnerabilities the way JiT does. You'll likely need to keep a separate AppSec tool running alongside Drata if code scanning is a requirement.
Is Drata cheaper or more expensive than JiT long-term?+
Drata is almost always more expensive since it's sold as an annual contract aimed at mid-size and larger companies pursuing certification, while JiT has a usable free tier for smaller teams. If you don't need SOC 2/ISO 27001 certification yet, staying on JiT's free tier and skipping Drata entirely is the cheaper path.