Best Make (Integromat) Alternatives 2026
Visual automation platform for complex workflows. Find free, indie, and cheaper options that work for your team.
Want to calculate your exact savings from Make (Integromat)?
Calculate Make (Integromat) Savings →What is Make (Integromat)?
Make (formerly Integromat) is a visual automation tool that excels at complex, multi-step workflows. Free tier with 1,000 operations; Core is $9/month with more operations and features.
Key Features
Why Look for Make (Integromat) Alternatives?
Make's interface is more complex than Zapier. The operation-based pricing model takes time to understand. Some popular apps have limited integration depth.
Common Pain Points
- •Steeper learning curve than Zapier
- •Operation-based pricing can be confusing
- •Some apps have limited triggers
- •Documentation could be better
Best Make (Integromat) Alternatives (2)
n8n
$0
100% savings
Open source, self-hostable. No limits when self-hosted.
Best for: Technical teams who can self-host
Visit n8n →Pipedream
$0
100% savings
Developer-first. 10k invocations/month free.
Best for: Developers who want code control
Visit Pipedream →How to export your data from Make
JSON · verified against official docs
Make head-to-head
More Dev Tools tools people are leaving
All Dev Tools alternatives →What would you save without Make?
Pick your team size and see the yearly number.
Tips for Switching from Make (Integromat)
Make (Integromat) alternatives: common questions
How do I export my scenarios when switching from Make?+
Make doesn't have a universal export-to-other-platform feature — you'll need to manually rebuild scenarios in the new tool, since automation logic isn't portable between platforms like Zapier, n8n, or Make. You can export a scenario's blueprint as a JSON file (from the scenario menu) which documents the modules and connections, useful as a reference while rebuilding elsewhere. Screenshot complex scenarios first so you don't lose track of branching logic during migration.
What features do I lose if I move from Make to Zapier?+
You lose Make's visual branching (router/filter paths shown side-by-side on canvas), which Zapier only approximates with Paths in higher-tier plans. You also lose Make's more granular error handling (retry, resume, ignore per-module) and native iterator/aggregator modules for looping over data — Zapier's looping is more limited and often needs a paid add-on or Code step.
Is Make's free tier enough for a small team's automation needs?+
Make's free plan gives 1,000 operations/month across two active scenarios, which is enough for light use (a few daily triggers) but tight if you're running multiple workflows or high-frequency polling triggers. Most small teams outgrow it within a few weeks and move to Core ($9/month billed annually) for 10,000 operations.
Does Make have fewer integrations than Zapier or n8n?+
Make has over 2,000 app integrations, fewer than Zapier's 7,000+, but it covers most mainstream SaaS tools (Google Workspace, Slack, HubSpot, Airtable, Notion) plus generic HTTP/webhook modules for anything without a native connector. n8n has fewer pre-built integrations than both, but its open-source nature and custom node support means you can build support for almost any API yourself.
How does Make's pricing compare to Zapier or n8n over a year?+
Make Core is $9/month billed annually ($108/year) for 10,000 operations, versus Zapier's Professional plan at roughly $69.99/month ($839/year) for 2,000 tasks — Make is significantly cheaper per operation at moderate volume. n8n Cloud starts around $20/month, or you can self-host it for free (just server costs), which is the cheapest long-term option if you're comfortable managing your own infrastructure.
Pro Tips
Ready to Switch from Make (Integromat)?
See exactly how much you'll save by switching to one of these alternatives.
Calculate My Make (Integromat) Savings →Looking for Something Similar?
Check out alternatives for related tools in the same category.